Structural analysis instead of gut feeling. We show you where your stocks and ETFs actually stand against their peer group. No buy or sell recommendations. Just substance.
Whether you start with your portfolio, scan the market or open a single stock — the logic is the same: peer-relative, rule-based, no recommendations.
ETFs are decomposed into their constituents, concentrations made visible, behavior under growth and valuation pressure framed. No performance figures — structure.
Scan your portfolio →
Every company measured against its functionally similar peers — not against the index average. Signals come from structural patterns, not price movements.
Scan the market →
Valuation vs. ROIC, market cap as bubble size, the focus stock in gold. A map that shows in seconds whether the stock fits structurally or stands out.
Open example report →
Profitability, growth, valuation, stability — side by side. The text on top says in one sentence where the actual difference lies. No data dump, just a placement.
Open comparison →
There are plenty of financial-analysis tools. What makes AssetNext different comes down to three points.
A P/E of 25 isn't "expensive" because some table lists 20 as the mean. We compare every company to its functionally similar peers. Valuation, quality, stability, growth get meaning from the actual distribution of the comparison group.
Many tools rely on fixed thresholds without reference to industry, business model or market phase.
No editorial team decides which stock is good or bad. The placement follows a documented rule set on publicly available data. You can verify why a position is placed where it is, instead of trusting a verdict.
Newsletters, YouTube stock analyses and robo-advisors operate on editorial or undocumented logic.
What happens when you hold a stock together with three ETFs? AssetNext resolves your ETFs into their individual positions and shows structural concentrations that you don't see at first glance.
Classic screeners and stock finders display individual stocks without the portfolio context in which they are actually held.
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF · 1,309 positions · per AssetNext
See with AssetNext what's actually inside. Holding an MSCI World? On paper, 1,309 companies across 23 developed markets, broadly diversified. The actual weighting looks different, down to the individual position:
The ten largest positions make up more than a quarter of the index. NVDA, AAPL and MSFT together 14%.
US dominates with 72.2%. Japan follows at 5.8%, after that every country below 4%.
Information Technology represents 29.4% of the index. The largest sector by a clear margin.
ETF lookthrough to the individual position. Peer comparison for every stock. You see what complements structurally and what doubles up.
You don't throw your money into an AI recommendation machine. You get a structured placement you can verify.
CSV, watchlist or manual entry. ETFs are automatically broken down into their constituents — all the way to the individual stock.
Each position is set against its functionally similar peer group. Valuation, quality, growth, stability — four dimensions, one 0–100 scale.
You see not just the numbers, but what they mean — in plain language, with clear placement. No recommendation, no pressure.
Start with your portfolio, a single stock or a direct comparison. The logic underneath stays the same — you decide where to enter.